EVIDENCE FILE of the Deliberate COVER-UP of Ronald Mallett’s involvement in FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION by both The SUN SENTINEL and The MIAMI NEW TIMES: for the Fenton Perspective January 29th, 2017 8 PM EST

EVIDENCE: What RON HIRTIBISE of the SUN SENTINEL knew
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 at 7:44 AM
From: “marshall barnes”
To: rhurtibise
Subject: World Patent Marketing/Ronald Mallett info from Marshall Barnes (we talked on the phone yesterday)

Dear Ron:

Below is the email that my associate, David Gap got in reply to his communication with the Florida AG’s office. Attached is a PDF copy of the report which contains evidence regarding potential violations of the Florida Revised Code (it’s easier to read than the email text following the AG office’s reply, below). As I stated, and the email below confirms, it was forwarded to the FTC. As the report states, the reason for my informing the Florida AG was that anyone buying Time Travel X, under the premise that the value was linked to that of Bit Coin, would lose all their money as my competitive operations began to move in the commercial area and totally dominate the discussion in regards to time travel development. Scott Cooper knew the real value was linked to that of Mallett’s research, but my activities would prove it to be fraudulent. Since the FTC action has happened, I have announced moves to provide a means to help what victims there are from the Time Travel X scam:

https://www.prlog.org/12633146-marshall-barnes-rd-eng-works-on-effort-to-help-victims-of-the-ronald-mallett-scam-time-travel.html#

If Time Travel X had been allowed to go forward, the scale of the scam was targeted to reach as high as $500 million! Please see the 16th paragraph at http://www.motherlandmagazine.com/ronald-mallett/ under the heading, SO WHERE DO THINGS STAND RIGHT NOW?. “The total amount to accomplish everything we are hoping to, both with space manipulation and time manipulation is probably going to be about $500 million, altogether.” You will see how Mallett tries to use the cost of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN as a way to justify raising that kind of money, which is ludicrous. My paper, below, proves that his alleged purpose is baseless, right down to its conceptualization and then rules it out based on the results of stunning, physical experiments, of which Mallett has none.

Mallett has never had to answer for his theories at all, and when I was promoting him in 2007, I discovered that his work wasn’t fully developed. 7 years later, I discovered that he had made no further efforts to seriously raise the money he said he needed (back then it was $250,000) then misled people about the true amount (actually $6 mil+) and what he actually was focused on was continually getting exposure for his personal story and increasing his fame for the bogus claim of working on the first time machine. That’s why we’re here in 2017 and he’s not accomplished one damn thing is the meantime – he’s solved no time related issues, no time travel issues, not made any professional presentations at science conferences on the subject, and most importantly – he’s never, during his time travel research career, published one single solitary paper dealing with the topic. None. The papers he did put out were several about the functioning of his proposed device design back around 2002, which were heavily flawed, as you will read in my latest paper, which is the third link below. During the last ten years, my work in the field has skyrocketed in terms of solutions found, experiments conducted and technology derived, to the point that Mallett isn’t even a peer anymore. In the end, Mallett will be forced to debate me in public or stand by helplessly as his credibility is crushed out of existence as people realize the truth. Actually, that will happen, even if he does do a debate – because he can’t win one.

https://www.prlog.org/12613870-new-similar-experiments-dramatically-achieve-rainer-plaga-suggestion-to-prove-parallel-universes.html

 

https://www.academia.edu/33308409/The_Invalidation_of_the_Time_Travel_Physics_of_the_Ronald_L._Mallett_PhD_LOTART_Design_By_The_Rachel_Emily_and_Suzy_Experiments_of_Marshall_Barnes_R_and_D_Eng

So the net result of any investment in Time Travel X would be a total loss of those funds because the promotion of my work in the commercial sphere would drive the value of Mallett’s research into the ground, as I unleash every element of competitive marketing creativity that I know, that I was already recognized for by Innovation Excellence in 2014 (see https://www.prlog.org/12317555-marshall-barnes-selected-to-be-one-of-25-storytellers-at-boston-innovation-event.html ) – https://www.prlog.org/12593092-scott-cooper-world-patent-marketing-face-devastating-challenge-in-time-travel-development-field.html#. Because the value of Mallett’s research is demonstrably vacuous, and as part of my marketing campaign, that was going to be a key aspect of my strategy (classic – “you don’t want Brand X”) he and Scott Cooper would have no defense against the relentless onslaught of real developments, new information, public demonstrations, books and TV specials. That onslaught has already begun and will be gaining momentum.

I’m only glad that the sale of Time Travel X has been halted but I have no idea how many people already bought it at $799 a unit. The sales were moved under the World Patent Marketing corporate structure from the Time Travel Technologies, LLC (which was the joint operation between Cooper and Mallett) – before the FTC struck. Time Travel Technologies, LLC, was allowed to expire at the Florida Secretary of State’s office, last year. So those records are part of the World Patent Marketing mess, which still has to be figured out.

I was told by an attorney, at the FTC, that Cooper admitted in a deposition that there was really no intention of making a time machine but to capitalize on so-called “alternative technologies” that would be spin-offs from the research, (which I know is B.S.) which is not what Time Travel X was marketed for, as you will see. This proves my allegations of fraud and misrepresentation ( see https://www.prlog.org/12558716-time-travel-theoretical-commodity-looks-like-scam-marshall-barnes-says.html# ). Mallett knows that I have publicly called him the biggest fraud in the history of physics and the reason he hasn’t challenged me, or threatened to sue for defamation, is because he knows I can prove it, and I will do so in a flash under oath – with relish, (and the truth is the defense against defamation), and I have already begun to prove what a fraud he is, in public. It’s having an effect. Already the African American Registry has completely removed his profile page where he had been listed as a “Time Travel Scientist” (see http://www.aaregistry.org/historic_events/view/ronald-mallett-scientist-time-travel ) . When they found out the truth, they wiped out his page completely, not just delete the part about his bogus time travel research accomplishments (see https://web.archive.org/web/20150304223958/http://www.aaregistry.org/historic_events/view/ronald-mallett-scientist-time-travel ).

Mallett is the absolute worst thing that has happened to time travel research and the exposure of the financial fraud, that he and Scott Cooper tried to perpetuate, would put a major mark against the field, which is why I’ve stepped up and will try to help, once any victims have been identified, to show that there is validity to real, active research in that area and it will not become a front for scam artists.

This story, of how far Scott Cooper was willing to take his scams and seeing a fellow scam artist in the famous Ronald Mallett, is the real back story to this whole affair. The truth is, they scammed each other – Mallett into getting Cooper to believe his B.S. based on the success of Mallett’s PR hype at that point, and conning the media, and Cooper into getting Mallett to believe that he knew what he was doing in regards to getting the big dollars that would make a difference. Both fooled themselves into believing that I was going to let them get away with it and had no ability to compete in the face of their united front. They were wrong.

Sincerely,

Marshall Barnes, R&D Eng
http://lanyrd.com/profile/paranovation/bio

> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 7:59 PM
> From: “thought of infinity” <to.infinity@publicist.com>
> To:@engineer.com
> Subject: Fw: From Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi
>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 7:03 PM
> > From: attorney.general@myfloridalegal.com
> > To: @PUBLICIST.COM
> > Subject: From Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi
> >
> > Dear Mr. Gap,
> >
> > This is to follow up on your telephone call and email to the office of
> > Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding World Patent Marketing.
> >
> > We appreciate the time and effort you took in bringing your concerns to
> > our attention. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued the following
> > news release regarding World Marketing Patent:
> >
> >
> > https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/03/ftc-halts-invention-promotion-scheme-charged-bilking-millions
> >
> > https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/172-3010/world-patent-marketing
> >
> > Because of their involvement with this case, I am forwarding your
> > correspondence to the FTC for review. You may follow up with this agency
> > at:
> >
> > Federal Trade Commission
> > 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
> > Washington, D.C. 20580
> > Phone: (202) 326-2222
> > Toll-free: (877) 382-4357
> > Website: http://www.consumer.ftc.gov
> > Online complaint form: https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov
> >
> > You may also wish to view the following web page about invention promotion
> > and patent businesses:
> >
> > http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/
> >
> > Finally, individual citizens may bring a civil action through the courts
> > for damages, attorney’s fees and court costs under Florida’s Deceptive and
> > Unfair Trade Practices Act. Because our office is not at liberty to give
> > legal guidance to individual consumers, please consult a private attorney
> > to discuss your legal options. The Florida Bar offers a Lawyer Referral
> > Service toll-free at (800) 342-8060 or visit
> > http://www.floridabar.org/divpgm/lronline.nsf/wreferral6?OpenForm.
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to make our office aware of your concerns.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Crystal Fukushima
> > Office of Citizen Services
> > Florida Attorney General’s Office
> > PL-01, The Capitol
> > Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050
> > Telephone: (850) 414-3990
> > Toll-free within Florida: (866) 966-7226
> > Website: www.myfloridalegal.com
> >
> > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL. THIS ADDRESS IS FOR PROCESSING ONLY.
> >
> > To contact this office please visit the Attorney General’s website at
> > www.myfloridalegal.com and complete the on-line contact form. Again,
> > thank you for contacting the Office of the Florida Attorney General.
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > Posted Date:
> > From:
> > To:
> > Subject: Attention Amaura: Potential Violations of 817.06 by World
> > Patent Marketing, Scott J. Cooper and Ronald L. Mallett
> > Dear Amaura:
> >
> > The below report is being sent to you for Marshall Barnes, whom you
> > discussed this with last week –
> >
> > Of Special Note: A PDF version of this email document is attached, which
> > may make it easier to share and maintain the formatting as intended.
> >
> > The following report is for review by any and all agencies of the State of
> > Florida, with authority and or per view, over matters dealing with the use
> > of misleading information in advertising and public statements designed to
> > commercially acquire funds from the general public for a product and or
> > cause that is demonstrably false, demonstrably contrived to deceive, and
> > demonstrably the product of a conspiracy to commit those acts.
> >
> > To expedite the understanding of the possible violations this report
> > contains, you can advance down to Exhibit #5-#7. Exhibits #1-#4 provide the
> > evidence for a pattern of behavior that then manifests in full as possible
> > violations in Exhibits #5-#7. Thus the evidence for deliberate and
> > premeditated violations of 817.06.
> >
> > For the purposes of transparency, the following report contains data
> > acquired and aggregated by a competitor to the principals accused in the
> > following report but not in the area in which any questions are raised
> > concerning violations of the law. Specifically, there is no competition
> > over the ability to commercially acquire funds from the general public in
> > the manner that is the sole focus of the principals in question.
> > Furthermore, 100% of the allegations against the principals involved are
> > based on their own statements, issued in person in public, in press
> > interviews, in advertisements, in press releases and in promotional videos.
> > All sources for the information and statements will be identified by links
> > to the actual documentation itself, so that there is no question as to the
> > validity of the allegations.
> >
> > Furthermore, it is to be understood that this report is not a tool to gain
> > a competitive edge on the part of the competition of the principals cited
> > herein, but to avoid the collateral damage that is certain to be suffered
> > by those who were taken in by the false and misleading advertising engaged
> > in by those principals who in fact, have no other business model but
> > pretending to have intellectual properties and innovative technologies that
> > are demonstrably, nonexistent, and impossible for them to achieve.
> >
> > In addition, it should be noted that Exhibits #1 through#4 are not actually
> > potential violations of the law, in and of themselves, but establish a
> > pattern of behavior that is part and parcel of Exhibits #5, #6 and #7 which
> > may be considered direct violations of the law. In other words, the intent
> > to violate the law is soundly established by the blatant utilization of
> > falsehoods in those first three Exhibits, which are then finally utilized
> > in a manner that could be a violation of the law because the effort to
> > solicit money from the public, using those false and misleading statements,
> > is finally executed in Exhibits #5, #6 and #7.
> >
> > The law in question is the following:
> >
> > 817.06 Misleading advertisements prohibited.
> >
> > “(1) No person, persons, association, copartnership, or institution shall,
> > with intent to offer or sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise,
> > securities, certificates, diplomas, documents, or other credentials
> > purporting to reflect proficiency in any trade, skill, profession, credits
> > for academic achievement, service or anything offered by such person,
> > persons, association, copartnership, corporation, or institution directly
> > or indirectly, to the public, for sale or distribution or issuance, or with
> > intent to increase the consumption or use thereof, or with intent to induce
> > the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto, or
> > to acquire title thereto, or any interest therein, or ownership thereof,
> > knowingly or intentionally make, publish, disseminate, circulate or place
> > before the public, or cause, directly or indirectly, to be made, published,
> > disseminated or circulated or placed before the public in this state in a
> > newspaper or other publication or in the form of a book, notice, handbill,
> > poster, bill, circular, pamphlet or letter or in any other way, an
> > advertisement of any sort regarding such certificate, diploma, document,
> > credential, academic credits, merchandise, security, service or anything so
> > offered to the public, which advertisement contains any assertion,
> > representation or statement which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.”
> >
> > In the following account, of the activities in question, those portions of
> > the law that may have been violated, will be placed in {} for a clear
> > identification and assessment. Due to the complex and scientific nature of
> > the information behind these activities, there will be no discussions
> > explaining the scientific validity of any of them, beyond the statements of
> > the principals themselves. In this regard, this report will only deal with
> > matters of fact and facts that will be evidentiary on their face.
> >
> > The activities and principals are as follows:
> >
> >
> > World Patent Marketing, (Principal #1) a corporation residing in Miami,
> > Florida has engaged in activity that may be covered under the above
> > mentioned statute, 817.06 ”Misleading advertisements prohibited”.
> > Specifically, World Patent Marketing, under the apparent direction of CEO
> > Scott J. Cooper (Principal #2) issued the following press releases, the
> > purpose it was to establish the narrative for a fund raising effort for
> > Ronald Mallett (Principal #3) based on nonexistent research and time
> > machine development, to follow later.
> >
> > EXHIBIT #1
> >
> > Dr. Ronald Mallett, Famous “Time Machine” Professor, Joins World Patent
> > Marketing Advisory Board
> > https://worldpatentmarketing.net/ronald-mallett-2/
> >
> > The statements in question within are:
> >
> > 1.”Professor Ronald Mallett is on the verge of creating the first working
> > “time machine.”. {No person, persons, association, copartnership, or
> > institution shall, with intent to offer or sell or in anywise dispose of
> > merchandise, securities, certificates, diplomas, documents, or other
> > credentials purporting to reflect proficiency in any trade, skill,
> > profession, credits for academic achievement, service or anything offered
> > by such person…}
> >
> > In this case, World Patent Marketing is using the title of Ronald Mallett
> > (Principal #3) as a professor, to sell the idea he is on the “verge of
> > creating the first working time machine”. At the time this release was
> > issued (November 6, 2015) Ronald Mallett was not only not close to
> > inventing anything, he had lost the race to build the first time machine
> > two years earlier (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12247224-marshall-barnes-wins-the-race-against-ronald-mallett-to-create-the-1st-time-machine.html
> > ). Furthermore, within 10 days of the press release, PBS NewsHour published
> > an article in which Mallett stated that, in regards to the concept of
> > twisting time, via his approach, it would take “an enormous amount of
> > energy. I mean a huge amount of energy, like stellar quantities,”. That, on
> > its face, precludes any conception that Mallett is on the verge of building
> > any kind of time machine, let alone the first.
> >
> > 2. “And it is being taken very seriously by academic researchers around the
> > world.” {No person, persons, association, copartnership, or institution
> > shall, with intent to offer or sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise,
> > securities, certificates, diplomas, documents, or other credentials
> > purporting to reflect proficiency in any trade, skill, profession, credits
> > for academic achievement, service or anything offered by such person…}
> >
> > In this case, the statement is false and misleading. By citing “academic
> > researchers around the world” it gives the appearance that Mallett’s theory
> > is accepted by academic experts in the field of theoretical physics. The
> > fact is, it is not. According to this video, Final Ron Mallett Time
> > Traveler, (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghPHiWt8xjc), at 1:09 on the
> > video counter the narrator states, “Professor Chandra Roychoudhuri has been
> > working with Mallett but seems skeptical about the possibility of time
> > travel…”. So this is a scientist working with Mallett *directly* who
> > isn’t sure about Mallett’s work!
> >
> > According to Wikipedia.org (see
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Mallett under “Criticism”) physicists
> > Ken Olum and Allen Everett are noted for publishing objections to Mallett’s
> > theory for which he has failed to respond in full, J. Richard Gott is
> > credited for pointing out another critical flaw which caused Mallett to
> > withdraw a portion of his theory, and in a private conversation with author
> > David Toomey, Marshall Barnes, the internationally noted research and
> > development engineer and conceptual theorist, was told that Stephen Hawking
> > and Kip Thorne thought, “Mallett’s work is poor”. Marshall subsequently
> > emailed Thorne (knowing that Hawking rarely answers any emails) with a test
> > to see if Thorne responded emotionally to a question about Mallett’s theory
> > Marshall sent the following email:
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:02 PM,
> >
> > Dear Professor Thorne:
> >
> >
> > I was wondering about your thoughts on Ronald Mallett’s work on time travel
> > issues, since that is an area in which you have some recognition. Do you
> > feel there is any chance of his overcoming the energy requirements with his
> > ring laser design, in order to get the proper gravitational effect that
> > would result in warping time into closed time-like curves, even on a scale
> > that would simply allow particles to travel backward to the moment his
> > device becomes a time machine?
> >
> > I look forward to your response.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > Marshall Barnes
> >
> >
> > 2/6/13 at 5:03 PM
> >
> > From:
> > Kip S. Thorne
> >
> > No.
> >
> > _____
> >
> > Furthermore, Marshall Barnes, Mallett’s sole competition, wrote the
> > definitive paper, destroying the validity of both his design, his
> > understanding of both the design and the physics it would require and his
> > ability to even comprehend the true nature of the subject at hand.
> > Published at the pre-print site, Academia.edu, dated October 15th, 2015 as
> >
> > RING LASERS, CLOSED TIMELIKE CURVES, CAUSALITY VIOLATION AND THE TOTAL
> > DESIGN FAILURE OF RONALD MALLETT’S TIME MACHINE OF SPACE-TIME TWISTING BY
> > LIGHT (see
> > https://www.academia.edu/19662264/RING_LASERS_CLOSED_TIMELIKE_CURVES_CAUSALITY_VIOLATION_AND_THE_TOTAL_DESIGN_FAILURE_OF_RONALD_MALLETTS_TIME_MACHINE_OF_SPACE-TIME_TWISTING_BY_LIGHT
> > ) it is a devastating rebuke whose abstract reads:
> >
> > “In this paper it will be proved conclusively that aside, from issues with
> > meeting energy requirements demanded by Einstein’s General Relativity and
> > other issues to create a time machine using rotating ring lasers (topics
> > already covered by Olum, Everett, Gott, et al) there are key and critical
> > issues that will cause the failure of Ronald L. Mallett’s time machine
> > design, both in function and expectation of the effect, that it would cause
> > in spacetime. These issues are part and parcel of Mallett’s approach to
> > time travel philosophically and thus not only dispel any notion of his
> > design ever working, but also any notion that Ronald Mallett has anything
> > more, than the most pedestrian conceptual understanding, to ever create a
> > working time machine. With such respect, it is not possible, if left to his
> > own devices, that Ronald Mallett will ever make a functioning time machine
> > of any kind or description. Furthermore, the author knows and has discussed
> > a number of related issues with Ronald Mallett, so this paper is not
> > produced from a detached place of observation but with intimate knowledge
> > of the subjects at hand.”
> >
> > In addition, these “academics from around the world” have never been
> > identified by World Patent Marketing, Scott J. Cooper or Ronald Mallett.
> > Later, (in Exhibit #4) establishing a pattern of behavior of deception in
> > this area, evidence will be presented as to how World Patent Marketing
> > created a deceptive portion of a video promo, that fraudulently infers that
> > scientists from around the world support Mallett’s time machine concept.
> >
> >
> > 3. “One thing is for certain, Professor Ronald Mallett is the man to do
> > it.” {the same statute portion as previously cited). On its face, in light
> > of the evidence presented so far, this statement is a false and baseless.
> >
> > 4.”World Patent Marketing has taken an interest in the hotly contested race
> > to create the first time machine, and have placed their bets on Ronald
> > Mallet.”
> >
> > This statement is more evidentiary as opposed to being evidence of
> > violations. It establishes, however, that World Patent Marketing and Scott
> > J. Cooper *knew about the competition between Marshall Barnes and Ronald
> > Mallett* and thus that Mallett *had lost* because there was no other hotly
> > contested race to build a time machine in the world! In the meantime,
> > Marshall Barnes had been presenting his machine, the Verdrehung Fan, which
> > opens micro wormholes into which radio waves and infrared pulses disappear,
> > across the country (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12247224-marshall-barnes-wins-the-race-against-ronald-mallett-to-create-the-1st-time-machine.html
> >
> > https://www.prlog.org/12365180-new-scientist-article-reveals-data-that-supports-marshall-barnes-presentation-at-mays-isdc.html
> >
> > https://www.prlog.org/12591460-marshall-barnes-proves-he-has-the-first-time-machine-in-the-world-at-heroes-and-games.html#
> >
> > https://www.prlog.org/12592744-marshall-barnes-launches-the-worlds-first-time-travel-development-effort-on-ground-zero.html
> > ) .
> >
> > 5. “This is incredibly exciting,” said Cooper…. “I am thrilled to welcome
> > Professor Ronald Mallett to our board, to help us take the field of physics
> > to its most cutting edge.”
> >
> > This is again, an evidentiary statement showing that Cooper and Mallett are
> > working together and that Cooper is using this relationship to create a
> > false impression. In fact, Mallett is incapable of helping World Patent
> > Marketing “take the field of physics to its most cutting edge” because
> > Ronald Mallett has never done anything in the field of physics that was
> > cutting edge. From his book, “Time Traveler: AScientist’s Personal Mission
> > To Make Time Travel A Reality”,
> >
> > “As a theoretical physicist, I learned long ago that I did not have the
> > aptitude for experimental work.” (first sentence, last paragraph, page
> > 165).
> >
> > These press releases are important because they establish, by their own
> > admission, the conspiracy between Scott J. Cooper and Ronald L. Mallett,
> > because they both knew that key elements of the narrative they were
> > promoting were false and without merit.
> >
> >
> > EXHIBIT #2
> > Press Release
> >
> > Dr. Ronald Mallett, Famous “Time Machine” Physicist, Joins World Patent
> > Marketing Advisory Board (November 9, 2015)
> > http://www.prweb.com/releases/worldpatentmarketing/ronald-mallett/prweb13072182.htm
> >
> >
> > 1. “According to academic journals and reports, Mallett is on the verge of
> > building the world’s first working time machine.” {No person, persons,
> > association, copartnership, or institution shall, with intent to offer or
> > sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise, securities, certificates,
> > diplomas, documents, or other credentials purporting to reflect proficiency
> > in any trade, skill, profession, credits for academic achievement, service
> > or anything offered by such person…}
> >
> > This statement is not only false, for reasons already presented, but
> > includes a new, additional falsehood – the inclusion of “academic journals”
> > into the narrative that Mallett is on the verge of building the world’s
> > first time machine. It is clear and obvious that the media has repeated his
> > exact story for the longer than the last 10 years, but there is not one
> > academic journal that has done the same, aside from the original piece in
> > New Scientist magazine in 2002, which although, it is a science magazine,
> > is not an academic journal that publishes peer reviewed papers. In fact,
> > New Scientist refers to itself as “New Scientist Magazine” (see
> > https://www.newscientist.com/help/#faq26). There no journal articles
> > supporting Mallett’s theory, just as there are no academic researchers
> > “around the world” taking his research seriously.
> >
> > 2. “This is incredibly exciting,” said Scott Cooper, CEO and Creative
> > Director of World Patent Marketing… “There is so much going on in
> > scientific research right now…and now theories that point to the real
> > possibility of time travel, it feels like we are on the edge of a new
> > frontier. I am thrilled to welcome Professor Ronald Mallett to our board,
> > to help us take the field of physics to its most cutting edge.” {No person,
> > persons, association, copartnership, or institution shall, with intent to
> > offer or sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise, securities,
> > certificates, diplomas, documents, or other credentials purporting to
> > reflect proficiency in any trade, skill, profession, credits for academic
> > achievement, service or anything offered by such person…}
> >
> > In no way possible is Ronald Mallett going to take World Patent Marketing
> > to the “most cutting edge”. Again, this statement was made in 2015 and he
> > has not made one improvement, development or progress of any kind, thus
> > establishing the pattern of behavior of baseless lies and false statements
> > on the part of both parties, over the last two years. In addition, Mallett
> > has even dropped the subject of time travel from his list of research
> > interests on his official University of Connecticut profile page (see
> > http://physics.uconn.edu/ronald-mallett/ as opposed to the older
> > http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~mallett/main/main.htm under “Primary Research
> > Interests” ).
> >
> >
> > EXHIBIT #3
> > World Patent Marketing tweet
> >
> > “Dr. Mallett will go back in time and possibly change the future
> > bit.ly/1HmHoTJ #ronaldmallett #timetravel #timemachine”
> >
> > https://mobile.twitter.com/WorldPatentMKTG/status/664730605255462912?p=v
> >
> > 1. This statement is an out and out lie. “Will go back in time” is a
> > statement that not even Mallett has ever made!
> >
> > 2. The tweet has a link to an article that appears to be from around from
> > 2007, and so is entirely outdated – yet it doesn’t even make that claim
> > that the World Patent Marketing tweet does. This is an important fact to
> > keep in mind – There is a history on Mallett’s part and the media, of
> > making claims that are baseless, twisting facts and making them up, prior
> > to Mallett becoming involved with World Patent Marketing. It could be
> > argued that Scott J. Cooper and World Patent Marketing, saw this pattern of
> > behavior, clearly endorsed and contributed to by Ronald Mallett, and
> > decided to continue it. World Patent Marketing and Scott J. Cooper’s
> > decision to follow suit, thus becomes evidence of conspiracy to then later
> > violate 817.06 by continuing that pattern of behavior together in an effort
> > to solicit funds from the public.
> >
> > EXHIBIT #4.
> > Florida Registration of Ronald Mallett as a party to Time Travel
> > Technologies, LLC
> >
> > 1. Both https://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2miryz/ronald-mallett and
https://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2mirx4/time-travel-technologies-llcshow
> > Ronald Mallett as a “manager” or “principal”, which indicates that Ronald
> > Mallett is more than a mere beneficiary of any funds raised by this entity
> > and has a more integral role in the company. It should also be noted that
> > the company is listed as “inactive” yet, in Exhibits #5 they have just
> > recently launched the selling of a “theoretical commodity”, the Time Travel
> > X, for $799 per unit.
> >
> > Here is the actual page from the Florida Secretary of State’s web site,
> > verifying the above information –
> > http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquiryType=DocumentNumber&aggregateId=flal-l15000195662-5c47890e-0700-477c-b06a-eeebd9ddd281&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=TIMETRAVELTECHNOLOGIES%20L150001956620&searchTerm=L15000195662
> >
> >
> > In addition, this is the link to the Electronic Articles of Organization
> > for Florida Limited Liability Company under File Number L15000195662
> > showing the date of November 19, 2015, ten days after their first
> > announcement (see
> > http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2015%5C1124%5C40285854.tif&documentNumber=L15000195662
> > ). Under Article III, Other provisions, if any: it states, “Time Travel”.
> > Although Scott Cooper indicated at the bottom of the document, that he
> > understood that the filing of an annual report was required between January
> > 1st and May 1st of the following year, and every year there after, records
> > indicate that he failed to do so, rendering the “Inactive” determination on
> > the account to date.
> >
> >
> > EXHIBIT #5
> > Introduction of Funding Instrument Under False Pretenses {an advertisement
> > of any sort regarding such certificate, diploma, document, credential,
> > academic credits, merchandise, security, service or anything so offered to
> > the public, which advertisement contains any assertion, representation or
> > statement which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading}
> >
> > On March 15, 2016, Scott J. Cooper issued the following video (see
> > https://vimeo.com/176076385 ) with the following misleading and false
> > statements in it (see video counter markers per statement). After an
> > introduction, hyping the possibilities of time travel, the video then
> > states:
> >
> > 1. Beginning at 1:12 on the video counter – “World-renowned physicist,
> > author and scholar Dr. Ronald Mallett, believes time travel is possible,
> > perhaps in the next decade.” That is a demonstrable lie. Remember, the year
> > before, November 2015, Mallett was quoted by the PBS NewsHour that to twist
> > time would require “stellar quantities” of energy. Because this video is
> > not promoting the concept of time travel in general – by any other source,
> > this statement can not be interpreted as meaning anything else but time
> > travel through the efforts of Ronald L. Mallett himself. Furthermore, in an
> > article published by Yahoo! News, written by two months later, This
> > Scientist Is Building A Real Time Machine – And Thinks It Will Work, it
> > states, “Mallett believes physical time travel is impossible”(see
> > https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-scientist-is-building-a-real-time-machine-100204594.html
> > ). The statements that follow substantiate this perspective as they all
> > refer to Mallett, leading up to the next false statement –
> >
> > 2. Beginning at 1:33, “His program, Space-Time Twisting By Light (STL)
> > Project…has gained support from scientists… ” This statement is false
> > and unsubstantiated. Instead of gaining support, the disagreement with it
> > has mounted, now including J.R. Gott, Michio Kaku, Ken Olum, Allen
> > Everrett, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne and Marshall Barnes. Barnes even
> > wrote the most devastating paper attacking the design of Mallett’s idea
> > from an engineering and conceptual point of view prior to Mallett’s PBS
> > NewsHour confession, once again, predating the video in question by more
> > than a year. If the viewer is meant to be misled into thinking, Mallett has
> > a breakthrough, by the false statement of support of the science community,
> > in the next visual it leaves no doubt –
> >
> > 3. Beginning at 1:42 an ABC news report by Amanda Onion, and dated March 6,
> > appears on the screen with the statement “…and the news media”. While
> > nothing in the world can be more true than the fact that Mallett has
> > received unprecedented news coverage over more than the last 10 years – and
> > having accomplished nothing during said time period, none of those news
> > reports is shown. In fact, the one that appears on the screen, from ABC
> > News with the heading, “Scientists Explain Why Time Travel Is Possible” is
> > in fact not about Mallett nor how scientists support him. The article can
> > be found here (see http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98062&page=1 )
> > and never mentions Mallett nor his theories. So it is clear that World
> > Patent Marketing placed that article there to support the false statement
> > that Mallett’s idea “has gained support from scientists” by causing it to
> > be seen by the unwary who may then assume that the time travel theory being
> > referred to by “scientists” is in fact, Mallett’s.
> >
> > 4. Beginning at 2:16, “World Patent Marketing has partnered with Dr. Ronald
> > Mallett…to make his vision a reality.” That statement may be true in
> > principle, but what that vision is, is in doubt. Is it time travel? How
> > could that be? Again, the PBS NewsHour admission that predates this video,
> > makes the statement impossible to fulfill and thus false. In fact, it has
> > now become apparent that since Mallett knows he can’t twist time, that he’s
> > now settling on trying to warp space to create faster communications (see
> > https://worldpatentmarketing.net/ronald-mallett/ ). Since that is not part
> > of the advertisements in question, that matter will be set aside. In
> > addition to that, once again fitting the pattern of misrepresentations and
> > lies on the part of Ronald Mallett, in the PBS NewHour article, previously
> > mentioned, It states,
> >
> > “However, twisting space may serve as the foundation for a warp drive.”
> >
> > Nowhere, in any literature on the subject does such an idea exist, since a
> > warp drive must contract space as it move through it – not twist it.
> > Mallett, in fact, was using that concept to make his work appear to still
> > be relevant now that he had to admit the time travel aspect was falling a
> > part. This proves that Mallett only had that one initial idea, and now that
> > it has appeared to be flawed, he has none other and appears incapable of
> > any other. Once again, making the statement on the part of Scott Cooper
> > that Mallett could take his company to the cutting edge of physics,
> > ridiculous on its face.
> >
> > 5. Beginning at 2:35, “Time Travel Technologies gives you the
> > opportunity…to fund research that will help make time travel
> > possible…and change the future.” This statement is false because, as
> > stated, Mallett doesn’t think physical time travel is possible, but that is
> > what is implied all throughout the video promo. There is also nothing in
> > Ronald Mallett’s research, which has not gone any further than it was in
> > 2007 or earlier, that will make time travel possible. Remember, the
> > advancements so far in time travel are already being made by his sole and
> > chief competitor, Marshall Barnes, R&D Eng. They include a special report
> > to select members of Congress (now a book) on time travel and its
> > implications, which resolved all of the related theoretical issues of often
> > cited (see http://www.blurb.com/b/5622324-paradox-lost-the-public-edition
> > ), the creation of the first time machine on a particle level, the
> > Verdrehung Fan, in 2012 (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12365180-new-scientist-article-reveals-data-that-supports-marshall-barnes-presentation-at-mays-isdc.html
> > ), which opens micro wormholes that can theoretically be enlarged and
> > stabilized with enough power and the device scaled-up in size, the
> > development in progress of a machine based on Nikola Tesla’s design for a
> > wall of light and intelligent energy as well as his latest breakthrough – a
> > physical experiment using lasers that has proved that parallel universes
> > exist and would be the solution to any attempt at time travel to the past
> > (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12601672-simulation-theory-gets-redone-by-research-of-marshall-barnes-rd-eng.html
> > ).
> >
> > This doesn’t include a number of research papers over the years that
> > Marshall has written, while Ronald Mallett hasn’t written one dealing with
> > time travel physics or theory. Mallett has nothing but his one idea which
> > he has now admitted, won’t get the job done. There is no practical research
> > that he has upon which to draw from, and to tell people that investing $799
> > will somehow fund time travel research is in principle, a despicable and
> > deliberate fraud, because Mallett has admitted that it will take millions
> > to even come close to really testing his idea (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12479498-ronald-mallett-admits-time-machine-to-cost-ms-making-marshall-barnes-undisputed-time-travel-expert.html
> > ), that after at least $300,000 is spent on a feasibility study, which if
> > his theory is a good as is advertised, the feasibility study shouldn’t be
> > needed.
> >
> > This same video has been put on Youtube (see
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WhJbolcVhI&index=5&list=PL1Z1xRkMpo-oRHd7g_-uk8sIN62xkVaBM
> > ) by World Patent Marketing
> >
> >
> >
> > EXHIBIT #6.
> > Statements by Ronald L. Mallett promoting violations of 817.06
> >
> > 1. Via Twitter, “Thanks for posting the World Patent Marketing video” (see
> > https://mobile.twitter.com/RLMallett/status/751455451880062976?p=v )
> >
> > The World Patent Marketing video in question is the one cited in Exhibit
> > #5. This proves that Ronald Mallett knew about efforts to promote said
> > video which contained false and misleading statements.
> >
> > 2. Via Twitter “@iosmacnstuff @DOCNYCfest for funding update
> > see:sfweekly.com/news/feature/t…”(see
> > https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=%40iosmacnstuff+%40DOCNYCfest+for
+funding+update+see&s=typd&x=15&y=7 )
> >
> > This is Ronald L. Mallett promoting a link to a December 21, 2016 San
> > Francisco Weekly article that has a link to the TimeTravelX.com marketing
> > web site, proving Mallett’s direct involvement in the promotion of
> > advertising containing false and misleading statements in violation of
> > 817.06.
> >
> >
> > EXHIBIT #7.
> > The web site https://worldpatentmarketing.com/product/time-travel-x/ is the
> > new and functioning site selling the “theoretical commodity”, Time Travel X
> > for $799. {“an advertisement of any sort regarding such certificate,
> > diploma, document, credential, academic credits, merchandise, security,
> > service or anything so offered to the public, which advertisement contains
> > any assertion, representation or statement which is untrue, deceptive, or
> > misleading”}
> >
> > 1. “JOIN DR. RONALD MALLETT’S QUEST
> > Purchase Time Travel X Virtual Memberhip Units. This purchase will be
> > governed under the Time Travel X End User Licensing Agreement (EULA).
> >
> > Time Travel Technologies grew out of a desire to provide funding for World
> > Patent Marketing Advisory Board Member, Dr. Ronald Mallet. Dr. Mallet is atheoretical physics professor at the University of Connecticut who has been
> > developing a ‘time machine.’ Don’t get too wildly excited, his model won’t
> > be sending humans back to the Jurassic any time soon”.
> >
> > The advertisement states that “Dr. Mallett is a theoretical physicist at
> > the University of Connecticut who has been developing a time machine.” That
> > is a lie. He has not ben developing a time machine. As stated earlier, he
> > has given up and described to PBS NewsHour that it would take enormous
> > amounts of energy to twist time Also, this is the first time that any
> > acknowledgment of the limitations of Mallett’s idea have been mentioned.
> >
> > “Mallet’s time machine is designed to test a hypothesis that arises from
> > Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, which predicts time loops for
> > atomic particles. Mallet intends to send the subatomic particles,
> > neutrinos, forward in time.”
> >
> > This statement is both inaccurate and confusing. Notice it says that
> > “Mallett intends to send the subatomic particles, neutrinos, forward in
> > time.” They are in fact neutrons not neutrinos and he wants to send them to
> > the past, not future.
> >
> > “Scott Cooper, CEO and Creative Director of World Patent Marketing,
> > proposed creating a theoretical commodity exchange tied to the price of
> > Bitcoin, that would act as alternative currency and provide funding for Dr.
> > Mallet’s project. Thus Time Travel Technologies came into being. Soon, you
> > will be able to buy and sell ‘minutes’ on the exchange”.
> >
> > Regardless of how World Patent Marketing structures it, the Time Travel X
> > commodity only has a value as it is perceived as being connected to the
> > research of Ronald Mallett and his prospects of creating a time travel
> > breakthrough. If that was not the case, people would just buy Bitcoins.
> > Remember, in the video promo at 2:35 on the counter, it states, “Time
> > Travel Technologies gives you the opportunity…to fund research that will
> > make time travel possible…and change the future.” and that is a lie. At
> > 2:57 in the same video, it states, Time Travel Technology accepts Bitcoin
> > as payment into travel research.” Finally, beginning at 3:27 it states,
> > “Create your own future..And help make science fiction science fact.”
> >
> > Once it becomes apparent that it is impossible for Ronald Mallet to do
> > anything that he has been advertised for, the value of the Time Travel X
> > commodity will collapse because no one else will want to fund him. After
> > all, that is the advertised purpose of the Time Travel X commodity – to
> > fund Mallett’s time travel developments.
> >
> > To be sure there is no misunderstanding, in as far as the talents and
> > abilities in the field of time travel research, as promoted by the media
> > are untrue, here is a segment from the beginning of Mallett’s career as a
> > time travel fraud, a documentary called, The World’s First Time Machine (of
> > course he didn’t actually have one…).
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbFxNcaJO_Y
> >
> > Beginning at 1:04 Then at 2:58 Mallett states, “As far as I’m concerned,
> > the paradoxes that people talk about are only going to be resolved after we
> > build the first time machine then we will know whether or not free will
> > enters into it, whether there’s multiple universes, or whether the universe
> > is determined. That’s going to have to be understood, experimentally”.
> >
> > However, Marshall Barnes not only proved that parallel universes would
> > resolve the paradox issue, he did so without needing a time machine, and
> > proved it with a physical experiment derived from a proposal first posited
> > by German astrophysicist, Rainer Plaga, which has been filmed and analyzed.
> > (see
> > https://www.prlog.org/12613870-new-similar-experiments-dramatically-achieve-rainer-plaga-suggestion-to-prove-parallel-universes.html
> > )
> >
> > There is no comparison between Mallett and Marshall. Mallett has been
> > trading on his name and the media’s willingness to hype his personal story,
> > while Marshall has been amassing a broad and significant area of
> > breakthroughs and projects, which he is now about to unleash on the world.
> >
> > Once it becomes widely known that Mallett has no such viable research
> > potential, and that all of the development action and breakthroughs are
> > happening with Marshall Barnes, that will be the end of the Time Travel X
> > commodity. Those who have already purchased it, under the blatant and
> > misleading promotions that have been utilized, may lose all of their money.
> >
> >
> > Conclusion
> >
> > These are the facts from which it can be determined by the State of Florida
> > if there have been violations of 817.06 and what actions should be taken.
> > If you have any questions, contact Marshall Barnes at 4th.d@engineer.com
> > who was instrumental in assembling this document, knows Ronald L. Mallett
> > personally, can attest to the accuracy of any further details, and is
> > willing to testify in court, if need be, as an expert witness.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > David Gap(See attached file: Potential Violations of 817.06 by World Patent
> > Marketing, Scott J. C

THIS IS WHAT HE DID WITH IT –  http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/93558149-157.html  No mention of Mallett’s collusion, fraud, or misrepresentations! No mention of the report sent to the Florida AG’s Office! ALL OF IT COVERED-UP!

EVIDENCE: What CHUCK STROUSE, Editor of the Miami New Times Knew 
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 at 12:36 PM
From: “marshall barnes”
To: “Chuck Strouse”
Subject: Re: Scott Cooper & Ronald Mallett from Marshall Barnes

Dear Chuck:

Attached please find the report sent to the Florida AGs office and below the end of this message, a copy of the email that we received in response, telling us of the FTC investigation and how our report was forwarded to them. In his testimony during a deposition session with the FTC, Cooper admitted that they weren’t going to use the funds from the sale of Time Travel X for time travel research but “spin-off technologies” from the research, according to FTC attorney, James Evans. I know what they claim they were planning and it’s demonstrably B.S. That was what they were going after $500 million for (see http://www.motherlandmagazine.com/ronald-mallett/ in the paragraph under the heading – SO WHERE DO THINGS STAND RIGHT NOW? which includes commentary on his relationship with World Patent Marketing).

Here is the link to the paper (see https://www.academia.edu/33308409/The_Invalidation_of_the_Time_Travel_Physics_of_the_Ronald_L._Mallett_PhD_LOTART_Design_By_The_Rachel_Emily_and_Suzy_Experiments_of_Marshall_Barnes_R_and_D_Eng ) I wrote disproving LOTART and exposing Mallett’s lack of aptitude for this kind of research, supported by my reproducible experiments which he had publicly stated in the film, The World’s First Time Machine, wouldn’t be possible until a time machine was built. I didn’t need one, and if he had been a real scientist in this field, he would have known about Rainer Plaga’s suggestion from back in 1995 that what I ended up doing was possible. I’m differentiating between his legitimate PhD in theoretical physics and any suggestion that that means he understands advanced concept temporal mechanics. He’s never written a paper on the topic and doesn’t even list time travel as a subject of research anymore on his university page – http://physics.uconn.edu/ronald-mallett/.

Thanks, I’ll be in touch.

Marshall Barnes, R&D Eng

EVIDENCE: What BRITTANY SHAMMAS Knew
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 at 3:44 PM
From: “marshall barnes”
To: “Brittany Shammas”
Subject: Re: Scott Cooper & Ronald Mallett from Marshall Barnes

Dear Brittany:

Great talking with you! Attached please find 3 screen grabs showing that WPM was involved in offering Time Travel X units for $799.00, that Mallett himself tweeted to thank someone for promoting the promotional video about it (that constitutes the promotion of misleading advertising) and a tweet from a WPM representative promoting Time Travel Technologies and WPM video (now removed – BUT HERE IT IS – on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/176076385 )

Here’s the breakdown of what’s wrong with that video (from the report to the Florida AG):

On March 15, 2016, Scott J. Cooper issued the following video (see https://vimeo.com/176076385 ) with the following misleading and false statements in it (see video counter markers per statement). After an introduction, hyping the possibilities of time travel, the video then states:

1. Beginning at 1:12 on the video counter – “World-renowned physicist, author and scholar Dr. Ronald Mallett, believes time travel is possible, perhaps in the next decade.” That is a demonstrable lie. Remember, the year before, November 2015, Mallett was
quoted by the PBS NewsHour that to twist time would require “stellar quantities” of energy. Because this video is not promoting the concept of time travel in general – by any other source, this statement can not be interpreted as meaning anything else but time travel through the efforts of Ronald L. Mallett himself. Furthermore, in an article published by Yahoo! News, written by two months later, This Scientist Is Building A Real Time Machine – And Thinks It Will Work, it states, “Mallett believes physical time travel is impossible”(see https://www.yahoo.com/news/this-scientist-is-building-a-real-time- machine-100204594.html ). The statements that follow substantiate this perspective as they all refer to Mallett, leading up to the next false statement –

2. Beginning at 1:33, “His program, Space-Time Twisting By Light (STL) Project…has gained support from scientists… ” This statement is false and unsubstantiated. Instead of gaining support, the disagreement with it has mounted, now including J.R. Gott, Michio Kaku, Ken Olum, Allen Everrett, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne and Marshall Barnes. Barnes even wrote the most devastating paper attacking the design of Mallett’s idea from an engineering and conceptual point of view prior to Mallett’s PBS NewsHour confession, once again, predating the video in question by more than a year. If the viewer is meant to be misled into thinking, Mallett has a breakthrough, by the false statement of support of the science community, in the next visual it leaves no doubt –

3. Beginning at 1:42 an ABC news report by Amanda Onion, and dated March 6, appears on the screen with the statement “…and the news media”. While nothing in the world can be more true than the fact that Mallett has received unprecedented news coverage over more than the last 10 years – and having accomplished nothing during said time period, none of those news reports is shown. In fact, the one that appears on the screen, from ABC News with the heading, “Scientists Explain Why Time Travel Is Possible” is in fact not about Mallett nor how scientists support him. The article can be found here (see http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98062&page=1 ) and never mentions Mallett nor his theories. So it is clear that World Patent Marketing placed that article there to support the false statement that Mallett’s idea “has gained support from scientists” by causing it to be seen by the unwary who may then assume that the time travel theory being referred to by “scientists” is in fact, Mallett’s.

4. Beginning at 2:16, “World Patent Marketing has partnered with Dr. Ronald Mallett…to make his vision a reality.” That statement may be true in principle, but what that vision is, is in doubt. Is it time travel? How could that be? Again, the PBS NewsHour admission that predates this video, makes the statement impossible to fulfill and thus false. In fact, it has now become apparent that since Mallett knows he can’t twist time, that he’s now settling on trying to warp space to create faster communications (see https:// worldpatentmarketing.net/ronald-mallett/ ). Since that is not part of the advertisements in question, that matter will be set aside. In addition to that, once again fitting the pattern of misrepresentations and lies on the part of Ronald Mallett, in the PBS NewHour article, previously mentioned, It states,
“However, twisting space may serve as the foundation for a warp drive.”

Nowhere, in any literature on the subject does such an idea exist, since a warp drive must contract space as it move through it – not twist it. Mallett, in fact, was using that concept to make his work appear to still be relevant now that he had to admit the time travel aspect was falling a part. This proves that Mallett only had that one initial idea, and now that it has appeared to be flawed, he has none other and appears incapable of any other. Once again, making the statement on the part of Scott Cooper that Mallett could take his company to the cutting edge of physics, ridiculous on its face.

5. Beginning at 2:35, “Time Travel Technologies gives you the opportunity…to fund research that will help make time travel possible…and change the future.” This statement is false because, as stated, Mallett doesn’t think physical time travel is possible, but that is what is implied all throughout the video promo. There is also nothing in Ronald Mallett’s research, which has not gone any further than it was in 2007 or earlier, that will make time travel possible. Remember, the advancements so far in time travel are already being made by his sole and chief competitor, Marshall Barnes, R&D Eng. They include a special report to select members of Congress (now a book) on time travel and its implications, which resolved all of the related theoretical issues of often cited (see http://www.blurb.com/b/5622324-paradox-lost-the-public-edition ), the creation of the first time machine on a particle level, the Verdrehung Fan, in 2012 (see https://www.prlog.org/12365180-new-scientist-article-reveals-data-that-supports- marshall-barnes-presentation-at-mays-isdc.html ), which opens micro wormholes that can theoretically be enlarged and stabilized with enough power and the device scaled-up in size, the development in progress of a machine based on Nikola Tesla’s design for a wall of light and intelligent energy as well as his latest breakthrough – a physical experiment using lasers that has proved that parallel universes exist and would be the solution to any attempt at time travel to the past (see https://www.prlog.org/12601672- simulation-theory-gets-redone-by-research-of-marshall-barnes-rd-eng.html ).
This doesn’t include a number of research papers over the years that Marshall has written, while Ronald Mallett hasn’t written one dealing with time travel physics or theory. Mallett has nothing but his one idea which he has now admitted, won’t get the job done. There is no practical research that he has upon which to draw from, and to tell people that investing $799 will somehow fund time travel research is in principle, a despicable and deliberate fraud, because Mallett has admitted that it will take millions to even come close to really testing his idea (see https://www.prlog.org/12479498-ronald- mallett-admits-time-machine-to-cost-ms-making-marshall-barnes-undisputed-time- travel-expert.html ), that after at least $300,000 is spent on a feasibility study, which if his theory is a good as is advertised, the feasibility study shouldn’t be needed.

This same video has been put on Youtube (see https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=2WhJbolcVhI&index=5&list=PL1Z1xRkMpo-oRHd7g_-uk8sIN62xkVaBM ) by World Patent Marketing
_________________________________________

Here’s another outrageous statement coming from WPM on Twitter – https://mobile.twitter.com/WorldPatentMKTG/status/664730605255462912?p=v

So, I think this will be good for a while, along with everything else you already have. You can see at a glance that Mallett and Cooper were lying and misrepresenting facts, all the time.

I’ll put together some talking points in relation to my own research, that you can use as a comparison about what’s really going on and why, that you’ll have on Monday when you get in. Also remember to check in on that judge on Monday.

Thanks,

Marshall

THIS IS WHAT BRITTANY AND CHUCK STROUSE DID WITH IT – http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/world-patent-marketing-scam-took-millions-of-dollars-from-inventors-9605870 No mention of Mallett’s collusion, fraud, or misrepresentations! No mention of the report sent to the Florida AG’s Office! ALL OF IT COVERED-UP!
Worse yet Brittany and Chuck allowed Mallett to paint himself as a victim when they reveal that he was paid $5,000 and didn’t lose a dime! Brittany also continued to refer to Mallett as a time travel researcher and scientist when she knew that that was lie! He isn’t!

This is the height of hypocrisy – In the same story where Brittany talks about all the people that lost thousands of dollars, sometimes their life savings, she reports that “Mallett was promised funding for his time-travel research and paid $5,000” and she has the unmitigated gall to portray him as a victim because he didn’t get the funding for his nonexistent research. “Time-travel researcher Mallett says much the same: “I was hoping to get money for my research. I didn’t get any money, I was disappointed, and I resigned.””

 Brittany didn’t have to even mention Mallett if she wasn’t going to tell the truth but no – she did and lied everytime. 9th paragraph in, she referred to him as “time travel scientist, Ronald Mallett” when there is no such evidence that he is one. How could he be when he’s never written a single paper on time travel science, he’s admitted that his theory won’t work, and he’s never done any experiments? These are all things that Brittany knew, after she talked with me several times for hours at a time, mostly about time travel science.
So she and the editor of The Miami New Times, not only obfuscated the truth about Mallett’s involvement – their propagated the lie that he’s a time travel scientist/researcher when that’s a part of his fraud and that he is some kind of victim, which he’s not. 
 

Hello Everyone, Yesterday, July 4, was the official project launch announcement for Time Travel Technologies. The World Patent Marketing promotional video for the project can be seen at: http://timetravelx.com
In the coming months project developments will be announced.

Time Travel Technologies Day(s) : Hour(s) : Minute(s) : Second(s) Get Product Launch Updates What if Time Travel wasn’t just an idea? Time Travel X is a theoretical…
TIMETRAVELX.WPENGINE.COM
 (Fig. #2.  Copy of Ronald Mallett Facebook post promoting the Time Travel X theoretical commodity that was created for him by Scott J. Cooper of World Patent Marketing)
Evidence of FRAUD. A screen grab from the World Patent Marketing site where they had started to offer Time Travel X for the price of $799 per unit. However, the basis on which it was being offered was rife with lies, which the Florida AG’s office saw fit to send to the Federal Trade Commission.
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s